Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Repercussions of Faulty Implementation of e-HRM – My Personal Experience


Repercussions of Faulty Implementation of e-HRM – My Personal Experience

Author- Ishita Alok

Thanks to Soniya’s blog topic, I do not need to enlighten any of you out there about what ESS can and can’t do. She has covered all the features and reasons as to why managing one’s own account at the work place is a convenient option and why every company today is trying to join this league.
Not to anyone’s surprise, 2 months back, the DGM of HR at my office too sent a power point presentation containing details of how all the earlier used softwares (like Empower, Orwell  etc..) were going to be old talk because they were being replaced by one single software called “MyManManagament – (M3) System”. This would be an effective replacement of the multiple tools that the company had been using to record and maintain employee data. There was buzz about it in every department as our earlier processes of leave approvals, attendance regularizations and clock in- clock out regularizations used to be manual and quite obviously tedious. I personally was elated about it because, having learnt about some of the SAP HR modules in the preceding weeks, I was excited to see their execution in my own company. But my thrill was only short lived. Here’s what happened with me.

When I had joined this company, the HR department had carried out its routine procedure of collecting my documents, getting my identity card readied, induction and of course getting my finger prints for the biometric machine. It so happened that the machine just never recognized my prints. It was always the case and it was a particular nuisance when in the evenings, the buses were leaving premises and I was standing in front of the machine and punching once, twice, thrice….I finally gave up and complained about this problem to the respective HR person, but in vain. He gave me an alternate solution. He said it would be ok to punch in 10 minutes before our shift ended. And it worked! I don’t know how but from then on, I started punching at approximately ten minutes to 5pm and was peaceful. This practise continued till Feb 2012 when M3S was introduced. The software went live on the 3rd of Feb, 2012. Now, as data (like shift schedules, employee details, holiday calendar etc) was fed into the software in the beginning of the month, there was no changing it. At least, we couldn’t do it without some sort of an authorization from our managers. It was informed to us that the period of Feb-April would be a trial session for the software and payroll would be generated from here, May onwards. We were given an “orientation” regarding the usage of the software and many people were apprehensive because it changed a lot of the processes that had been in practise over here for more than five years. But the lady giving us the introduction said that it was to get used to the idea of M3S and that we were having a trial run so there was no need to panic. There was no warning given to us that the old softwares which we had been using would be rendered ineffective from that moment on.
Having been assured, people started checking out swipe in-swipe out displays, leave balances and team calendars on a regular basis on M3S. The general shift timings of our department is 8.30 am-5.00 pm. For the rest of the office, the general shift is from 8.00 am to 5.00 pm. This data had been fed into M3S for every employee. The other 2 shifts are 6.30 am-3.00 pm and 3.00 pm to 11.30 pm. Another point to note here is that almost 90% of the crowd uses office commute to travel. So the shift schedules were fed into the software and employee biometric data was collected as always. As was my habit, I used to punch in 10 minutes before our shift ended. So when I checked my own M3S record, I was taken aback to see systemic errors against which it showed “Loss of Pay for early clock-out” in a yellow block against the date. This was the case on several days. When I checked with the guy who was responsible for the data maintenance of the software, he said that I was to punch out not a minute before 5 pm. The system was programmed to function this way and it would show these errors in many cases. That was the day I realised that there were n number of people throughout the office who used to punch out early just like me and we all had the same issue. We were again ensured (even in written communication from the head of our department) that there would be no loss of pay since this was still running on a trial basis. But at the end of the month, that very guy released a list of all those employees (which practically included most of the office) who had these kind of systemic errors and that the salary for the month was indeed going to be generated from M3S. There was a lot of retaliation from people. My immediate manager even took it up with the HR department and raised our concerns but he was also hushed up in a very unprofessional manner.
There were issues like the buses coming in late due to traffic, some emergency popping up due to which employees got late by a few minutes and on some days, overly large queues to punch in! We were in such a helpless state and there was no one to understand us. The worst thing that happened in that month was that people in that list had to regularize their attendance using their respective leave quotas. And there were people who had as many as 27 LOPs. For all the people whose case was like mine (early punch by 1 or 2 mins), it was quite distressing as we were very much present in the office premises till the end of the shift, we all use the office commute and hence there was no way we could’ve taken off earlier than scheduled. But no amount of pleading worked with the HR department. They said nothing was in their hands and that it was a group office order so we all had to abide by it. Strangely enough, hardly any of the employees from the HR department had issues of this sort which is probably why they never understood our frustration. It was the most unfair usage of power displayed by our DGM and many people went on to saying things like the office was just looking for a second source of income. Today, thanks to this system, I have just 3 leaves left in my quota for the rest of the year (my leaves for this year will be credited on 31st Dec, 2012 as per company policy). Mine was the only department that had the option of Casual Leaves (CLs) as we’re a 6 day working department, but since M3S couldn’t accommodate CLs, and so we were deprived of this privilege too.
The reason behind narrating this long incident in my blog is that I wanted you all to understand the depth of the problem. Mismanagement of the software by one single department (in fact only a handful of people) has caused problems in so many people’s work lives. I’m not making it up when I say that there are quite a few people who’ve put down their papers just because they do not agree with the level of discomfort that this software has caused. Of course, the soul motive behind implementing this system was to introduce a far more superior tool to manage employee data. But it back fired really badly and is very easily visible on people’s faces. Employees have become victims to the CEO’s orders and are paying for it through their noses. After a lot of poking around, a few seniors found out that the entire training program given to the people in the HR department for the implementation and smooth running of the software was of low quality. The trainers as well as the trainees were under qualified and one can only imagine the level of understanding and knowledge transfer that would’ve taken place during the 2 month long training session. The guy who updates the software currently can speak nothing but Hindi and Marathi, and his communication is insufferable. If this is the kind of people who’re going to manage employee data, where are we to go! Who do we go to, to raise our concerns and who will be a solution provider to us?
This blog covers a very narrow aspect of a wide range of problems that could be faced in many other ways in different companies. Unless there is understanding of the importance of these kinds of softwares, technology can help us only so much. Just as significant is the usage of e-HR, its enactment has an equal weightage. Mismanagement of systems like these will only aggravate employees into taking drastic steps and in the end the only losers will be the management.

12 comments:

  1. First of all I wish to empathize with the work culture @ your organization ! This is the live example of how technology can be abusive "IF NOT HANDLED WITH A CLEAR STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE AND A STRONG COLLECTIVISTIC ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE". I felt that proper customization can be the solution and also incremental improvement is the key to open such kinds of dead locks. HR in an e-enabled world needs to be more of a person who "reasons" even with the technologies at his service! Rules, policies and technologies are made by us and for us. The new face of HR must understand and practice it now more than ever, so that we still dictate the technology and not the other way round which Ishita is facing!How-much-so-ever grand the technology can be and it is still at our discretion as to how much we should take help of it, even if it is available just a call away! The decision making power and the rationalizing capacity of our cortical brain we must always utilize upto max ... and it is the most critical thing in an e-enabled world ! Thanks Ishita to share your experience and I believe we all will get benefited by the knowledge you shared !!

    Regds
    Surabhi

    ReplyDelete
  2. Its quite some experience, and you are absolutely correct the repercussions can be high if HR is not well trained in it.

    But Darling Ishita, there are always some teething problems that exist during any such change in process. Speaks of their inability to foresee things. Cost to the Company is very high during such transitions. You are correct that there should have been a few selected trained employees who could further train others in operations. Well shared !!

    Rashmi

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know how frustrating it can be when an employee can loose his leaves because of such new systems, and where HR being HUMAN RESOURCE department, not being much of help to the employees.Its an interesting blog about the disadvantages of a very good management system implemented in a wrong way. Hope your frustrations are reduced to some extent after writing this experience. It will be more interesting to see you and Leean debate on this topic as she has mentioned the opposite side of the story.

    Hope to see a good debate ahead.


    Amit S Jadhav

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Surabhi..that is so true. Just because technology has been introduced, people have forgotten about the usage of the very thing that created technology --> Our brains! People are so dependent on softwares that no amount of logical reasoning works with them, they’d rather trust a set of wrongly recorded set of data than a live person. It is indeed a disturbing trend.

    @Rashmi..Thank you! :) I understand that change is a very difficult phase for any company. But if the HR department can’t foresee any kind of trouble during the implementation process, then we have gaping holes in the entire set up! Right from the level of the DGM! And besides, what I’m indignant about is the fact that we were blatantly lied to. It was clearly told to us that the software would be on a trial run and they end up making us lose out on our already cut short set of leaves! They could not have played us in a worse way..

    @ Amit.. It definitely helped the frustration levels. I went through Leean’s blog after you mentioned it. Well, I think what she is referring to is pure data analysis which anyone who is familiar with excel and the likes would be able to do. There is no need for any kind of a HR background there, but when I say there is dire need of a well-planned training program here, I mean to say that when people are explaining genuine issues to you that the system is not able to capture, the respective HR person must be able to come up with solutions to the same, and this kind of a problem solving ability should be a part of that training program because ultimately, it is the system that is creating the problem. And even if they can’t, they should at least not worsen it for people..as it is people are frustrated with the system..why give them furthermore reasons to get upset and think of steps as drastic as resignations?


    I hope I was able to convincingly respond to your comments. Thanks for the same! :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I can understand the frustration and anger from the tone of your blog. I believe there are limitations to any software that has been implemented for the first time, and unfortunately you were the victim of the same. However, if we go back to the rules of any organization which mandates the working hours for any employee, this has to be followed by any means. Anything short of it would be treated as deviation from the norms that have been set.

    As far as your case, you could have approached the Human resource personal and should have worked out with him if anything could have been done, However I still feel the implementation done is correct since you had not followed the time constraints that your organization had baselined. Its just that you had not realized before the implementation of the same, but now you do !! :)

    Regards,
    Abhinav

    ReplyDelete
  6. True, I did not follow the punch out timings maintained as per the company rules. But if I am in office 45 mins prior to the time when my shift starts (7.45 am), I really don't think it matters if I punch out at 4.58 pm..especially when people in the HR department are aware that I use the office commute! I was still over doing my time in office, wasn't I?
    I did what my HR personnel told me to do when I initially faced a problem. If rules changed, it was his duty to inform me and save my leaves...there was no other way that I would've known! I don't think I'll ever be calm about this issue, so I'm applogetic about my tone but I really think its justified :)

    Regards,

    Ishita

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can easily relate to your situation.We come across such issues quite often in daily life. We introduce new technology to simplify our lives. But in the end, we end up complicating our simple lives.

    Regards

    Rucha

    ReplyDelete
  8. Very well written blog Ishita.... based on personal experience.. The way the HR department handled the entire issue was pathetic.

    Firstly it should be understood that the software is programmed to serve our needs... be it any software, from operating systems(OS) to user programs.... the software should have catered for a 15- 30 minute lag in the time of log in and log out... I cant believe the software personnel who designed this software made such a careless mistake.. Human error is inevitable... this is from the software side and the department handling this.

    Secondly... The HR department.. as you have mentioned... should not have rendered the old software useless... if it was a trial period both the softwares should have been kept in case of error... that was another crucial error..

    Thirdly... The HR department should have handled the unhappiness of the employees professionally and even given some incentives for the bad software decisions made...

    e-HRM does have alot of benefits.. but in the case of your company.... if they are not handled properly it can cause disruption in the normal working of the company... A one month trial is never enough to set a system into place.. it takes errors n rechecks to make sure it works properly.. it may take even up to 6 months and the HR department should be well equipped to handle this trial period...

    Regards,

    Leean

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you Rucha, for putting my entire ordeal into a concise form. Yes, true, this is a case possible anywhere and unless and until people in HR take a step towards implementing such systems flawlessly, it is indeed going to be a rough ride for us employees.

    Leean, there were obviously a number of things that were overlooked from the stage that the software was even introduced to us. The things that you have enlisted are just a drop in the ocean of mismanagement that is taking place within this organization. I have explored only one small bit of it. I have to say that when I had joined I never thought I would have to see such days in a reputed company, but apparently I was wrong.

    Regards,

    Ishita

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear Ishita,

    This is a classic "tail wagging the Dog" syndrome.... & all in the name of discipline & technology....

    All the more reason for the real Human Resource Practitioner with LAMP to stand up and be counted!

    Can you see why this was a disaster from the word go?

    Sad Story, but i am even more saddened by the fact that even though SO MANY of you were affected by this SILLINESS, you all chose to 'run away' of 'keep quiet' rather than 'make hell'....

    NO ONE CAN CAUSE INJUSTICE TO ANOTHER without the OTHERS PERMISSION (EXPLICIT or IMPLICIT)

    and all because we are concerned about the SECURITY Of a JOB which is SO MEANINGLESS?

    WHEN WILL WE CEASE TO EXIST & BEGIN TO LIVE??

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dear Sir,

    I think "tail wagging the dog" is the most apt way to put what we're going through. All I've learnt about this organization in a year is that the HR dept has a tight grasp around the rest of the departments and we just dance to their tunes. That has been the trend since the set up times and no one has ever changed it..

    They say if you can't beat them, join them. That is one thing people pick up very quickly over here. Ideally (and I know a lot of my classmates who do beleive this), job security should never become so important that other people should be allowed to exploit you but as is the case most of the times, a huge chunk of people are just there for the money and they don't care about any other form of satisfaction. Hence justified is the "running away" and "keeping quite"..

    I think the brand name is holding quite a few people back and from what I've seen and heard, that is why the company is still functional. Anyway..I'm hoping that my tenure here will approach its end soon and I will finally work somewhere where employees get their due respect.

    Regards,

    Ishita

    ReplyDelete