Wednesday 11 April 2012


Will Humans perform better if appraised by Machines ?

Author- Rashmi Singh

Why does an organization want E-performance ?
High competence
High congruence
High commitment
Cost effective……….. Uff, these jargons !!! Transformation. Demand of the day.

Three things that can happen:
You Think, Think and Think !   Quite entertaining actually !!

But do you THINK?
Of course, you are just another Thinker !!

What do you Think :
What do you think of your own performance?
What do you think of the ratings given?
What do you think of the feedback generated?
What were the circumstances that you over performed or under- performed?


With Automated Performance Appraisal Software

Performance Appraisal Software has given freedom from dreadful paperwork, managing leaves, attendance, holidays, absenteeism, training etc.
This robust software has initiated a silent but powerful revolution in the HR department by helping a smooth transition from a total manual job to fully automated process. A standard Employee Appraisal System enables the organizations to seamlessly align their corporate outlooks with that of the employees. Now, equipped with this tool, the HR manager can fill the appraisal forms, prepare the questionnaire via online medium and forward them to the selected employees and receive them in the same way.
Easy ain’t it !!
Performance appraisal software saves HR Management's time significantly over manually maintained records. Managers can more easily communicate business strategies, plans and produce measurable targets for their employees that will support specific and overall company objectives. It provides management the tools of individual performance measurement so they can identify and cultivate top performers for further development and establish a pay for performance compensation plan.
Automated appraisal systems helps to maximize Return on Talent Investment.


How do they do it ?

Performance Management Module enables monitoring each employee's performance, picking up the flaws and finding the areas for which the concerned employees need to be trained.

The whole system automates the task of chalking out, implementing, tracking, and evaluating a robust appraisal process in systematic and confidential way for ensuring best results.

The methodology adopted and parameters evaluated by organisations to measure employees' performance varies greatly. Employee Performance Appraisal System is designed to agile  and flexible to enable companies define the desired fields and parameters associated with the process as and when required . This ensures flawless and more accurate mapping of employee-wise role to their Key Performance Indicator and Key Resource Area.

Automated appraisal systems, can evaluate your employee in absolute terms and compare his performance with other employees doing the same job. It is widely believed that competition always motivates employees to enhance their performance significantly. The resulting evaluation identifies the best as well as weak employees and distinguishes them for performance appraisal.
Performance Appraisal System as a module can have a 360° appraisal process, managing Appraisal Managers and complete database having external appraisers, standard/customized templates etc. The matured HRMS (Human Resource Management Software) having all the functionalities and all data in structure form provides lot of analytics part to evaluate the employee performance.
How does it help?
1.     With an increase in the completeness, accuracy, and appropriateness of information gathered
2.     Plenty of feedback, a relatively higher level of organizational control, and a greater ability of the organization to judge performance
3.     Increase in the importance of quantitative measures in the evaluation and thereby increase in the importance of the evaluation itself
4.     Higher quantity of work output and a corresponding increase in productivity
5.     Increase in the level of stress, a decrease in satisfaction, and a decrease in the quality of relationships with peers, supervisors, and senior management.
What do we achieve ?
Enhanced capability to control the quantitative aspects of individual performance


Without Automated Performance Appraisal Software

Ok, so you can Think !!
But do you FEEL?
Of course, you are just another HUMAN !!

What do you FEEL?
If everything is automated, what are humans needed for?
Feel, how will you react to a feedback given by a machine?
How will you feel if continuously monitored by your system?
Whom do you trust, people or machines?

Are we forgetting the Human aspect to the whole thing???
Although e- performance appraisal can have several benefits, but can technology replace aspect that can only be human?

Lets refer to the 5th point again :
“increase in the level of stress, a decrease in satisfaction, and a decrease in the quality of relationships with peers, supervisors, and senior management”

How about a dialogue !  Words can heal numbers cant !!
Employee Motivation and all those theories to enhance performance!!

Extensive use of numerical performance feedback seems to create a more competitive environment which may decrease the quality of social relationships between peers and between supervisors and subordinates.

Does an employee needs to be measured for everything. How will you perform in a controlled environment and continuous monitoring ??  I will run away :D

Most likely, any computerized performance monitoring may result in a workplace that is less satisfying to many employees.
Will this kind of system not highlight the negatives or negative ratings rather than the positives?
A computerized performance monitoring system may provide an increase in the amount of quantitative feedback and minimize the emphasis given to subjective information in performance evaluations. Reducing the emphasis on subjective measures may improve performance evaluations only to the extent that job performance can realistically be measured using numerical counts. On the other hand, many aspects of an individual’s work may not lend themselves well to numerical measurement. One simple example is the thoroughness with which a claims investigator processes a claim. Strict use of numerical counts leads to the undesirable attitude portrayed by the comment, “When in doubt, pay out!”
Lets review it with the Model of Performance Monitoring. How do you implement the Expectancy Model of extrinsic motivation, (perceived increase in productivity) since the outcome of performance should be given as feedback to the employees and to be tied to a reward structure?

Behavioural aspects of performance measurement. How can you apply the Behaviourally Anchored Rating System to the organization and get behavioural based scores. Can a automated system anchor human behavior?
It might be still easier to give employee ratings and create an organization based Performance Bell Curve. But can a machine give individual feedback and restore the fact that it has to be taken positively by the employee.

Infact, there might be a need for a more comprehensive model of performance monitoring and control systems. Which works simultaneously with human intervention as and when required. It may include:
the flow of performance related information in the organization, the process whereby managers use this information, employees response to the process of measurement, the type of feedback and its subsequent influence on behavior, and potential changes in the underlying social structure of the organization, identify human behavior and response to situations, measure their actions and reactions to activities, measure employee work interest areas, measure there approach towards work, employee enthusiasm and so on.

Fairness of these Automated Performance Monitoring Systems would purely depend on researchers’ ability to gather “sensitive” data on individual performance, process all sensitive and non- quantitative and subjective data/ information to accurately access the employee performance, gather individual reactions to performance monitoring systems, and organizational monitoring and control decisions.


How fair is this fairness, only future can tell !!               

Some references from googlebaba.com, rest is original :)
----------------






13 comments:

  1. This is one of the best blog or a article that i have read recently. The best part of this experience was, i felt i was having a conversation than reading. very well explained. As I was reading i had many doubts, but all the doubts were cleared at the end of the blog, and the best point in the blog i feel is “increase in the level of stress, a decrease in satisfaction, and a decrease in the quality of relationships with peers, supervisors, and senior management” which was explained very well. Rashmi, Thank you for letting us know, no matter how advanced the technologies are but humans are still needed in today's corporate world.

    Amit S Jadhav

    ReplyDelete
  2. A very entertaining blog Rashmi ! A conversational way I really appreciate.It has raised too many valid questions and could answer them too to some extent. Though I could not understand the direct correlation of technology upon employee stress and lowered satisfaction! Also can we explain it better in light of expectancy theory? As per Vroom if motivational force = expectancy*instrumentality*valence then why it can not be measured and monitored? And also I feel(as you well said we are humans :))if we can explain how a LAMP framework can be applied on it and then can we reach to the conclusion of why its efficiency, effectiveness and impact can/can not be measured then that would be a real value addition to all of us ! All the admiration for an innovative way of explaining and expressing..kudos for the approach ! :)

    Rgds
    Surabhi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words Surabhi...
      Since the central Idea is whether automation or the HRM software can independently conduct and perform the performance appraisal without human intervention, lets Think more.
      How can one design an effective Computerized Appraisal System, when one is not clear about What behavior enables performance for an individual and gets eventually recognised and what not?
      From these systems perspective, suppose Surabhi is an employee : Can we say Surabhi will be most productive when her log time is maintained , her tasks are rated and measured each time, and monitored how many times you leave your desk, time taken for task completion and so on……… driven by the process and not feelings !! Does it not affect Surabhi’s performance and freedom to work. Are we not Social being and some amount of human intervention required at all phases. Let technology be a facilitator, isn’t it?
      Moreover, How can you measure Trust?
      What about Appraisal satisfaction, Will you be able to measure employee appraisal satisfaction again with a computer generated rating? Should an Appraisal satisfaction measure be Participative in nature or Authoritative? What about employee Ambition and Career Plan ?
      Inflated ratings. Can anyone deny the existence of criteria contamination and deficiency, from computerized performance appraisal system?
      What would you prefer really Organic or Artificial ?? : )
      I suggest you refer “The Brave new World of E-Hrm” (Page140-162) , also refer to the Reductionist approach, which is an extension of Sanjiv’s blog.
      Another simple thing,
Dont you think that each Individual is Unique ? So will you design a seperate measure for each one of them? Think Think.
      The reason why i asked all to Think and Feel, is the same precisely :)
      Can we establish one single Logic (LAMP) that fits everyones uniqueness.

      Delete
    2. Thanks a lot for you took pains to address my queries.Just to make it little lighter, I have got "Thinking Diarrhoea" for now and may be it is due to "Question Overload" ;) so Let's discuss further in the class Rashmi :)

      Delete
  3. This is exactly what I meant when I said that, yes, e-HRM and all these fancy softwares do look good and make life easier and are a mark of how progressive the organization is. But to forget the human factor or the contribution of cognitive activities while using these things is a catastrophic error! We imagine and think and invent but that becomes the end of it..we think our work is completed there. What we tend to miss out is how significant the role of a thinking mind is...especially when it has to do with the appraisal and motivational level of an employee.It is an integration of technological and cognitive activities which will result in a successfully functional e-HRM process.
    Thank you for bringing this software to our attention, Rashmi. I will surely be sharing your blog with my immediate manager (at least) and hope that this will be implemented (unlike the painful M3S system in my office) in a planned and organized manner.

    Regards,
    Ishita

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am yet to come up with Rashmi specific Performance Appraisal Software :)

      Delete
  4. Nice blog Rashmi.... indeed it was very conversational and interactive... very interesting to read.. :-)

    however some suggestions ;-)... Performance appraisal software does have its advantages... but imagine.. would you really like a machine giving you your results??... i mean at the end of the day a computer is a computer without emotions or feelings... if a computer sends you a computer generated mail saying 'good job' it would feel good .. but if your boss comes up to you and say 'good job' thats an even better feeling...

    im not denying the fact that machines do not have any benefits.. as i have mentioned in my blog.. computers can decrease the work load and perform accurately.. but in the process of appraisal.. it is a sensitive topic.. and being judged by a machine feels undermining to the human mind..

    so i would suggest that the HR department can use computers to help and assist them.. but nothing more.. the entire job should not be left for computers.. the communication of results should be done through human interaction...

    Regards,

    Leean.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey dear your blog is very different in the sense that its captures 2 different; paradoxical and ironical views together. Were you in a split personality mode while writing this blog?? lols... When I started reading I thought u support technology and then drastic change, u step in the anti tech mode. Though interesting.

    But i agree with both the parts in the blog. Certainly technology has eased lot of manual work that we do. But it is equally important that we do not become slaves in the hands of technology and blindfoldedly just see its advantages and selectively ignore over use of technology. Technology can work wonders only when used wisely and with human interventions wherever necessary especially in crucial areas like providing feedback on performance. if I have as issue with my feedback, i certainly cant expect the e-tools to answer my queries. I need a live human being to resolve them through interaction. Afterall we are 'social beings and desire social interaction.

    Regards
    Mittal

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with amit,surabhi and rest that It is an very different and very interactive blog. And easy for me to understand as well. Even I had some problems in understanding some of the terms but after reading your reply to the surabhi's Questions I am very much sure about it.
    Thanks for sharing this informative blog...:)

    ReplyDelete